Joe Coan responds to allegations after his ex accused him of domestic violence and drug dealing (Exclusive)
In recent weeks, a woman named Emily Villers, who also goes by Emily Elizabeth on Instagram, began sharing a series of serious allegations against former 90 Day Fiancé: Before the 90 Days cast member Joe Coan, known to viewers for his storyline with Polish partner Magda.
Emily became highly active across Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and especially within 90 Day Fiancé online communities, where she repeatedly attempted to expose Joe for what she described as a pattern of disturbing behavior. She claimed she dated him officially for six months and alleged that during that time he put his hands on her, leaving “baseball‑sized bruises” that lasted for weeks. She also accused him of being an alcoholic and an active drug user, saying he sold prescription drugs such as Adderall and Xanax to random women and could finish an entire bottle of liquor in one sitting.
According to Emily, she stayed with Joe despite these alleged incidents because she felt emotionally attached in a toxic way and convinced herself he would eventually stop the behavior. She claimed the abuse never stopped and that Joe continued being, in her words, “a drunk addict and abusive man.” She further alleged that Joe cheated on her during their relationship and that she caught him messaging other women behind her back. Emily’s posts circulated widely in communities known for supporting women who speak out about alleged mistreatment, which placed Joe in a difficult position as the accusations spread quickly and were repeated without verification.
Because these allegations were shared in large online groups, they created a situation where Joe risked significant damage to his reputation and career, regardless of whether the claims were true. The online reaction became overwhelmingly one‑sided, leaving Joe with what appeared to be a losing battle unless he addressed the situation publicly or pursued legal action. Given the seriousness of the accusations and the speed at which they spread, we reached out to Joe directly on Instagram to obtain his side of the story.
According to Joe, Emily’s allegations are entirely false and motivated by a desire for attention. He provided us with a photo of his bruised face from last Halloween, implying that Emily was the one who physically assaulted him. Joe stated that she would “hit him closed‑fist all the time,” but insisted that he would never hit a woman back under any circumstances. He described Emily as someone seeking attention, followers, and OnlyFans subscribers, which explains why she targeted *90 Day Fiancé* communities because they are known to support women who share abuse stories.
Joe also said Emily has no evidence for her claims and is using “reverse psychology” to paint him as the abuser. While Emily has only shared photos proving they were together, she has not provided any evidence supporting her accusations of violence or drug activity. Joe, meanwhile, shared a photo of his bruised face and pointed out that Emily works as an OnlyFans webcam model despite publicly presenting herself as a yacht booking agent and someone who does gardening‑related gigs in Miami.
Joe concluded his statement by saying he never officially dated Emily and that their relationship was merely a “situationship,” adding that he made it clear he could never introduce her to his family due to what he described as her violent behavior when drinking.
As a viewer of the show, it is possible to believe Joe struggles with alcohol, as similar behavior was shown during his season. However, the more extreme allegations—drug dealing and domestic violence—are harder to verify, and if they were true, one might expect his ex Magda to have spoken out, given she spent significant time with him in both Poland and the United States.
For now, it remains Emily’s word against Joe’s, and unless Emily provides concrete evidence, her claims cannot be confirmed. What is clear is that both sides have presented drastically different stories, and the public should be cautious about forming conclusions without seeing the full picture.